Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered “Logic of Appropriateness”
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- critical perspectives-on-gender-and-politics
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Politics & Gender
- Vol. 2 (02), 223-235
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x06221044
Abstract
Why develop a comparative politics of gender? As the critical perspectives in this section demonstrate, there are many answers to this question. I would like to focus here on two reasons: first, for gaining a deeper understanding of the operations of political institutions, and second, for explaining the relationship between these institutions and social actors, including those pursuing a gender equality agenda. To be specific, this essay argues not just for a comparative politics of gender but for a comparative politics of gender and institutions. The discussion focuses on the possibility of using neo-institutionalist theory, especially in relation to its normative and dynamic understanding of institutions, to gain a deeper understanding of the way that gender shapes political institutions and also, through interaction with social actors, including feminists, the way gender norms can be disrupted to open new spaces for these actors.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Common Language of Gender?Politics & Gender, 2005
- Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered InstitutionsAmerican Political Science Review, 2003
- Gendering the agenda: the impact of the transnational women's rights movement at the UN conferences of the 1990sWomen's Studies International Forum, 2003
- In Their Own Words: New Labour Women and the Substantive Representation of WomenThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 2001
- GENDERING RESEARCH IN POLITICAL SCIENCEAnnual Review of Political Science, 1998
- Ending the Marginalization: Strategies for Incorporating Women into the United Nations Human Rights SystemHuman Rights Quarterly, 1997
- From Sex Roles to Gendered InstitutionsContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1992