Critical appraisal of papers reporting recommendation on sarcopenia using the AGREE II tool: a EuroAIM initiative
- 1 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Vol. 74 (8), 1164-1172
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-020-0638-z
Abstract
Background/objectives The growing interest of medical community about sarcopenia resulted in the production of several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), with an unavoidable variability in terms of the overall quality of those publications. Our aim is to evaluate the quality of CPGs on sarcopenia using the AGREE II instrument. Subjects/methods We performed an online literature search for sarcopenia CPGs using different databases. Four independent reviewers evaluated the quality of CPGs using the AGREE II instrument. To classify the quality of each guideline, we defined specific thresholds of final score: high-quality if five or more domains scored >60%; average-quality if three or four domains scored >60%; low-quality if <= 2 domains scored >60%. Results Our literature search yielded 315 articles, and after applying exclusion criteria our final analysis included 19 CPGs. The overall quality of CPGs was remarkable, as 13/19 (68.4%) were considered of "high-quality" CPGs, with more than four domains reached a score higher than 60%. "Scope and Purpose" and "Clarity of Presentations" had the best domain results (78.4% and 73.8%, respectively), while the two domains with the lowest scores were "Rigor of Development" and "Applicability" (61.5% and 58.7%, respectively). Interobserver variability ranged between moderate (0.624) and fair (0.275). Conclusions Our study showed that the overall quality of CPGs about sarcopenia was noteworthy, as more than two-third of paper obtained a "high-quality" score. The domain "applicability" had the lowest score, suggesting that emphasis should be put on possible strategies for helping other doctors to implement guideline recommendations in clinical practice.This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Indications of Use and Reporting of DXA for Body CompositionJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 2013
- Conflict of Interest Disclosures for Clinical Practice Guidelines in the National Guideline ClearinghousePLOS ONE, 2012
- Biomarkers of sarcopenia in clinical trials—recommendations from the International Working Group on SarcopeniaJournal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 2012
- Methodology of Clinical Nutrition Guidelines for Adult Cancer PatientsJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 2011
- Conflict of Interest in Clinical Practice Guideline Development: A Systematic ReviewPLOS ONE, 2011
- Prevalence of financial conflicts of interest among panel members producing clinical practice guidelines in Canada and United States: cross sectional studyBMJ, 2011
- A Critical Appraisal and Comparison of the Quality and Recommendations of Glaucoma Clinical Practice GuidelinesOphthalmology, 2011
- Nutritional Recommendations for the Management of SarcopeniaJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health careCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosisAge and Ageing, 2010