Importance of Femoral Tunnel Placement in Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 34 (3), 456-463
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281239
Abstract
Background Previous studies have identified the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament fibers as one of the primary determinants of fiber tension behavior. In addition, a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been shown to restore the intact knee kinematics more closely than does a single-bundle reconstruction. Hypothesis An anterior tunnel position in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores the biomechanics of the normal knee more closely than does a posterior tunnel position. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Kinematics and in situ forces of human knees after double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 2 different femoral tunnel positions (anterior vs posterior) were evaluated using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Within the same specimen, the resulting knee kinematics and in situ forces were compared. For statistical analysis, 2-way analysis of variance repeated measures were performed. Results The femoral tunnel position of the double-bundle hamstring graft had significant effect on the resulting posterior tibial displacement and in situ forces of the hamstring grafts. The anterior femoral tunnel position provided significantly less posterior tibial translation than did the posterior tunnel position. There was a tendency toward higher in situ forces of grafts fixed in the anterior tunnel when compared to the posterior position, but this difference was statistically not significant. Conclusion An anterior position of the bone tunnels in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores the normal knee kinematics more closely than does a posterior position of the tunnels. Clinical Relevance In double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, posterior placement of the tunnel should be avoided.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Posterior cruciate ligament injuriesCurrent Opinion in Rheumatology, 2002
- Quantitative Analysis of Human Cruciate Ligament InsertionsArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1999
- Posterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1996
- Long-Term Followup of the Untreated Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient KneeThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1996
- Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: Part IIArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1995
- The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position and Graft Tensioning Technique on Posterior Laxity of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed KneeThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1995
- The posterior cruciate ligament arthroscopic evaluation and treatmentArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1994
- Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachmentsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1989
- The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligamentThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1982
- Posterior problems in the kneeThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1981