Reliability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Blood Pressure Monitoring
- Vol. 6 (6), 291-295
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00126097-200112000-00005
Abstract
To focus on the reliability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and on its limitations in clinical practice, and to construct adequate strategies to improve ambulatory monitoring performance. The literature was reviewed, and personal data were used. Since the beginning of non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, it appeared that some subjects had a high proportion of outlying readings that were unlikely to be accurate. Although ambulatory blood pressure is more reproducible than clinic blood pressure, large day-to-day differences have also been reported in reproducibility studies for average 24 h blood pressure. It has been shown that, for day-to-day 24 h blood pressure differences greater than 4/3 mmHg, ambulatory blood pressure is poorly predictive of the degree of target organ damage. The variability of average 24 h blood pressure may arise from several causes, including true biological variability, a lack of standardization of activities and measurement errors. Artefactual readings can easily occur if patients are not properly instructed. Although editing procedures can eliminate outliers, it is often impossible to identify inaccurate readings included within the patient's trend. To optimize ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, health-care providers should be instructed adequately on how to perform this technique. Appropriate patient selection, a proper application of instrumentation and the checking of its performance, careful instructions to patients, the immediate evaluation of the patient's diary and 24 h tracing after completion of the recording should improve the results of ambulatory monitoring. A checklist of criteria that should be used for optimizing ambulatory monitoring in clinical practice should be proposed by the Consensus Conference on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. To improve doctors’ proficiency, strategies including educational protocols and training programmes should be implemented.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ambulatory blood pressure predicts end-organ damage only in subjects with reproducible recordingsJournal Of Hypertension, 1999
- Cardiovascular Outcome in White-Coat Versus Sustained Mild HypertensionCirculation, 1998
- Prediction of Cardiac Structure and Function by Repeated Clinic and Ambulatory Blood PressureHypertension, 1997
- Multiple standardized clinic blood pressures may predict left ventricular mass as well as ambulatory monitoringA metaanalysis of comparative studiesAmerican Journal of Hypertension, 1995
- Ambulatory blood pressure. An independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension.Hypertension, 1994
- Factors affecting ambulatory blood pressure reproducibility. Results of the HARVEST Trial. Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study.Hypertension, 1994
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring use in hypertension research and clinical practice.Hypertension, 1993
- Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a critical review of the current methods to handle outliersJournal Of Hypertension, 1992
- Blood pressure measurement: an epitaph for the mercury sphygmomanometer?Clinical Science, 1992
- EditorialJournal Of Hypertension, 1990