Changing interpretations, stable genes: responsibilities of patients, professionals, and policy makers in the clinical interpretation of complex genetic information
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Genetics in Medicine
- Vol. 10 (11), 778-783
- https://doi.org/10.1097/gim.0b013e31818bb38f
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007Genetics in Medicine, 2008
- Genomic Profiles for Disease RiskJAMA, 2008
- The Genome Gets Personal—AlmostPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2008
- Genetics education in medical school: a qualitative study exploring educational experiences and needsMedical Teacher, 2008
- Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controlsNature, 2007
- Non-replication of association studies: “pseudo-failures” to replicate?Genetics in Medicine, 2007
- On the synthesis and interpretation of consistent but weak gene-disease associations in the era of genome-wide association studiesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct‐to‐consumer marketing of genetic testsAmerican Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-Seminars In Medical Genetics, 2006
- Duty to re-contactGenetics in Medicine, 1999
- The Duty to Recontact: Attitudes of Genetics Service ProvidersAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999