Neonatal survival: a call for action
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- series
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 365 (9465), 1189-1197
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71882-1
Abstract
To achieve the Millennium Development Goal for child survival (MDG-4), neonatal deaths need to be prevented. Previous papers in this series have presented the size of the problem, discussed cost-effective interventions, and outlined a systematic approach to overcoming health-system constraints to scaling up. We address issues related to improving neonatal survival. Countries should not wait to initiate action. Success is possible in low-income countries and without highly developed technology. Effective, low-cost interventions exist, but are not present in programmes. Specific efforts are needed by safe motherhood and child survival programmes. Improved availability of skilled care during childbirth and family/community-based care through postnatal home visits will benefit mothers and their newborn babies. Incorporation of management of neonatal illness into the integrated management of childhood illness initiative (IMCI) will improve child survival. Engagement of the community and promotion of demand for care are crucial. To halve neonatal mortality between 2000 and 2015 should be one of the targets of MDG-4. Development, implementation, and monitoring of national action plans for neonatal survival is a priority. We estimate the running costs of the selected packages at 90% coverage in the 75 countries with the highest mortality rates to be US$4·1 billion a year, in addition to current expenditures of $2·0 billion. About 30% of this money would be for interventions that have specific benefit for the newborn child; the remaining 70% will also benefit mothers and older children, and substantially reduce rates of stillbirths. The cost per neonatal death averted is estimated at $2100 (range $1700–3100). Maternal, neonatal, and child health receive little funding relative to the large numbers of deaths. International donors and leaders of developing countries should be held accountable for meeting their commitments and increasing resources. Published online March 3, 2005 http://image.thelancet.com/ extras/05art1216web.pdfThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Making health systems more equitableThe Lancet, 2004
- Effect of a participatory intervention with women's groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: cluster-randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- The Decline in Maternal Mortality in SwedenAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2004
- Regionalized perinatal care in developing countriesSeminars in Neonatology, 2004
- Effect of community-based promotion of exclusive breastfeeding on diarrhoeal illness and growth: a cluster randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2003
- Effect of community-based peer counsellors on exclusive breastfeeding practices in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Community-based prevention of perinatal deaths: lessons from nineteenth-century SwedenInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural IndiaThe Lancet, 1999
- Efficacy of home-based peer counselling to promote exclusive breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 1999
- MATERNAL MORTALITY-A NEGLECTED TRAGEDYThe Lancet, 1985