S&P 500 Indexers, Delegation Costs, and Liquidity Mechanisms
Preprint
- 1 January 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier BV in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The largest S&P 500 indexers replicate the index with tracking errors of just several basis points per year. Maintaining such small errors requires a nearly exact-replication strategy and precludes profiting from trading much before or after index changes. A strategy of trading at the open following the announcement of a change, rather than at the change, adds 19.2 basis points more return per year with virtually no added risk, but with substantial tracking errors. This additional return is a measure of the delegation costs in monitoring an indexer through tracking errors. The paper then shows that less than half of indexers always follow an exact-replications strategy, consistent with the hypothesis that they are trying to recoup some of these delegation costs. Further, market mechanisms have evolved that allow some exact-replication indexers to recapture a portion of these costs.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Arbitrage Flatten Demand Curves for Stocks?The Journal of Business, 2002
- The Impact of Capital Gains Taxes on Stock Price Reactions to S&P 500 InclusionPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- Let's hope new proposals eliminate poor social careNursing Standard, 2000
- Demand Curves for Stocks Do Slope Down: New Evidence from an Index Weights AdjustmentThe Journal of Finance, 2000
- New Evidence on Stock Price Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 IndexThe Journal of Business, 1997
- An Anatomy of the “S&P Game”: The Effects of Changing the RulesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- EXCESS RETURNS OF INDEX REPLACEMENT STOCKS: EVIDENCE OF LIQUIDITY AND SUBSTITUTABILITYJournal of Financial Research, 1994
- Changes in the Standard and Poor's 500 ListThe Journal of Business, 1991
- Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 List: New Evidence for the Existence of Price PressuresThe Journal of Finance, 1986
- Do Demand Curves for Stocks Slope Down?The Journal of Finance, 1986