The Physician's Responsibility toward Hopelessly Ill Patients
- 12 April 1984
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 310 (15), 955-959
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198404123101505
Abstract
EFFORTS to define policies on withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining procedures from hopelessly ill patients are a relatively recent development. In 1976, when two major hospitals publicly announced their protocols in treating the hopelessly ill, the Journal marked the event with an editorial titled "Terminating Life Support: Out of the Closet!"1 Since then, the subject of permitting patients to die has emerged into the open. The courts have issued several well-publicized decisions since the 1976 Quinlan case,2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 and legislatures in 15 states and the District of Columbia have enacted "natural death" acts (California, 1976; Idaho, 1977; Arkansas, 1977; New Mexico, 1977; . . .Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allowing the Debilitated to DieThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Guidelines for the determination of death. Report of the medical consultants on the diagnosis of death to the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchJAMA, 1981
- Patient Autonomy and Death with DignityThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Michigan's Sensible Living WillThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Cessation of therapy in terminal illness and brain deathCritical Care Medicine, 1978
- Terminating Life Support: Out of the Closet!The New England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Personal Directions for Care at the End of LifeThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- Optimum Care for Hopelessly Ill PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1976
- A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain DeathJAMA, 1968