Impact of model developments on present and future simulations of permafrost in a global land-surface model
Open Access
- 7 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in The Cryosphere
- Vol. 9 (4), 1505-1521
- https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-1505-2015
Abstract
There is a large amount of organic carbon stored in permafrost in the northern high latitudes, which may become vulnerable to microbial decomposition under future climate warming. In order to estimate this potential carbon-climate feedback it is necessary to correctly simulate the physical dynamics of permafrost within global Earth system models (ESMs) and to determine the rate at which it will thaw. Additional new processes within JULES, the land-surface scheme of the UK ESM (UKESM), include a representation of organic soils, moss and bedrock and a modification to the snow scheme; the sensitivity of permafrost to these new developments is investigated in this study. The impact of a higher vertical soil resolution and deeper soil column is also considered. Evaluation against a large group of sites shows the annual cycle of soil temperatures is approximately 25% too large in the standard JULES version, but this error is corrected by the model improvements, in particular by deeper soil, organic soils, moss and the modified snow scheme. A comparison with active layer monitoring sites shows that the active layer is on average just over 1 m too deep in the standard model version, and this bias is reduced by 70 cm in the improved version. Increasing the soil vertical resolution allows the full range of active layer depths to be simulated; by contrast, with a poorly resolved soil at least 50% of the permafrost area has a maximum thaw depth at the centre of the bottom soil layer. Thus all the model modifications are seen to improve the permafrost simulations. Historical permafrost area corresponds fairly well to observations in all simulations, covering an area between 14 and 19 million km(2). Simulations under two future climate scenarios show a reduced sensitivity of permafrost degradation to temperature, with the near-surface permafrost loss per degree of warming reduced from 1.5 million km(2) degrees C-1 in the standard version of JULES to between 1.1 and 1.2 million km(2) degrees C-1 in the new model version. However, the near-surface permafrost area is still projected to approximately half by the end of the 21st century under the RCP8.5 scenario.This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- An improved representation of physical permafrost dynamics in the JULES land-surface modelGeoscientific Model Development, 2015
- A retrospective analysis of pan Arctic permafrost using the JULES land surface modelClimate Dynamics, 2013
- Uncertainties in the global temperature change caused by carbon release from permafrost thawingThe Cryosphere, 2012
- The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamicsGeoscientific Model Development, 2011
- The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxesGeoscientific Model Development, 2011
- Role of Polar Amplification in Long-Term Surface Air Temperature Variations and Modern Arctic WarmingJournal of Climate, 2010
- The environment and permafrost of the Mackenzie Delta areaPermafrost and Periglacial Processes, 2009
- Evaluation of Global Precipitation in ReanalysesJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2008
- An evaluation of deep soil configurations in the CLM3 for improved representation of permafrostGeophysical Research Letters, 2007
- Permafrost Thaw Accelerates in Boreal Peatlands During Late-20th Century Climate WarmingClimatic Change, 2005