Vagueness and Archaeological Interpretation: A Sensuous Approach to Archaeological Knowledge Formation through Finds Analysis
- 2 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Norwegian Archaeological Review
- Vol. 50 (1), 66-88
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2017.1325393
Abstract
The rapid development of natural scientific methods coupled with the recent popularity of new materialist philosophies in archaeological theory has raised discussion about the possibility of a return to empiricism in archaeology. While empiricism as a pragmatic philosophy is in line with archaeology’s hands-on character, the recent development has left some concerned about the vanishing role of vagueness and ambiguity in archaeological interpretation. In this setting, the exactitude of natural scientific methods is seen as a process of simplification that compromises the tacit dimensions of archaeological knowledge. This article discusses vagueness as an elementary part of all archaeological knowledge formation, with a particular emphasis on the role of perception and senses in finds analysis. Archaeological finds analysis is explored as an example of epistemologically vague and creative hypothesis formation.Keywords
This publication has 100 references indexed in Scilit:
- Curation as research. A case study in orphaned and underreported archaeological collectionsArchaeological Dialogues, 2012
- Follow the Cut, Follow the Rhythm, Follow the MaterialNorwegian Archaeological Review, 2012
- Things Are Us! A Commentary on Human/Things Relations under the Banner of a ‘Social’ ArchaeologyNorwegian Archaeological Review, 2008
- Materials against materialityArchaeological Dialogues, 2007
- Visualizing Archaeologies: a ManifestoCambridge Archaeological Journal, 2007
- Vision, Media, Noise and the Percolation of TimeJournal of Material Culture, 2006
- Animated ImagesJournal of Material Culture, 2006
- Archaeology without -ismsArchaeological Dialogues, 2006
- MetaarchaeologyActa Archaeologica, 2001
- The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporealityNorwegian Archaeological Review, 1996