Propensity Score Methods for Confounding Control in Nonexperimental Research
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Vol. 6 (5), 604-611
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000359
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Adjusting for Instrumental Variables on Bias and Precision of Effect EstimatesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustrationPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2011
- Doubly Robust Estimation of Causal EffectsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- Treatment Effects in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding: Dealing With Observations in the Tails of the Propensity Score Distribution--A Simulation StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2010
- Different Methods of Balancing Covariates Leading to Different Effect Estimates in the Presence of Effect ModificationAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural ModelsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Evaluating uses of data mining techniques in propensity score estimation: a simulation studyPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2008
- A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Variable Selection for Propensity Score ModelsAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983