Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of moral regulation.
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Vol. 96 (3), 521-537
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013779
Abstract
A distinction is made between two forms of morality on the basis of approach-avoidance differences in self-regulation. Prescriptive morality is sensitive to positive outcomes, activation-based, and focused on what we should do. Proscriptive morality is sensitive to negative outcomes, inhibition-based, and focused on what we should not do. Seven studies profile these two faces of morality, support their distinct motivational underpinnings, and provide evidence of moral asymmetry. Both are well-represented in individuals' moral repertoire and equivalent in terms of moral weight. but proscriptive morality is condemnatory and strict, whereas prescriptive morality is commendatory and not strict. More specifically. in these studies proscriptive morality was perceived as concrete, mandatory, and duty-based, whereas prescriptive morality was perceived as more abstract, discretionary, and based in duty or desire; proscriptive immorality resulted in greater blame, whereas prescriptive morality resulted in greater moral credit. Implications for broader social regulation, including cross-cultural differences and political orientation, are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping moral motives: Approach, avoidance, and political orientationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2008
- Morality: An Evolutionary AccountPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2008
- Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development.Psychological Bulletin, 2008
- MoralityPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2008
- Omission bias, individual differences, and normalityOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2004
- Evidence for bivariate systems: An empirical test of appetition and aversion across domainsJournal of Research in Personality, 2003
- Omission bias in vaccination decisions: Where’s the “omission”? Where’s the “bias”?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- Culture and Social Obligation: When “Shoulds” Are Perceived as “Wants”Journal of Research in Personality, 2002
- Beyond pleasure and pain.American Psychologist, 1997