Retention treatment after periprosthetic total hip arthroplasty infection
- 27 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in International Orthopaedics
- Vol. 36 (4), 723-729
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1324-5
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare infection control rates between implant retention and two-stage revision and assess the effectiveness of retention treatment in THA.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysisInternational Orthopaedics, 2010
- Treatment results with debridement and retention of infected hip prosthesesScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Midterm to Long-term Followup of Staged Reimplantation for Infected Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Surgical site infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after primary total hip replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2008
- Higher Risk of Failure of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prosthetic Joint InfectionsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2007
- Outcome of Prosthetic Joint Infections Treated with Debridement and Retention of ComponentsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Setting up a multivariable analysisPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2006
- The management of peri-prosthetic infection in total joint arthroplastyThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006
- Periprosthetic Total Hip InfectionClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002
- Risk Factors for Prosthetic Joint Infection: Case‐Control StudyClinical Infectious Diseases, 1998