Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores
- 24 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Osteoporosis International
- Vol. 20 (9), 1539-1545
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0820-y
Abstract
Two-dimensional areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the proximal femur measured by three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in 91 elderly women was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) aBMD results measured in the same patients. The measurements were highly correlated, though QCT aBMD values were marginally lower in absolute units. Transformation of the QCT aBMD values to T score values using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) DXA-derived reference data improved agreement and clinical utility. World Health Organization guidelines promulgate aBMD (g cm(-2)) measurement of the proximal femur for the diagnosis of bone fragility. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in QCT to facilitate understanding of three-dimensional bone structure and strength. To assist in comparison of QCT-derived data with DXA aBMD results, a technique for deriving aBMD from QCT measurements has been developed. To test the validity of the QCT method, 91 elderly females were scanned on both DXA and CT scanners. QCT-derived DXA equivalent aBMD (QCT(DXA) aBMD) was calculated using CTXA Hip software (Mindways Software Inc., Austin, TX, USA) and compared to DXA-derived aBMD results. Test retest analysis indicated lower root mean square (RMS) errors for CTXA; F test between CTXA and DXA was significantly different at femoral neck (FN) and trochanter (TR) (p < 0.05). QCT underestimates DXA values by 0.02 +/- 0.05 g cm(-2) (total hip, TH), 0.01 +/- 0.04 g cm(-2) (FN), 0.03 +/- 0.07 g cm(-2) (inter-trochanter, IT), and 0.02 +/- 0.05 g cm(-2) (TR). The RMS errors (standard error of estimate) between QCT and DXA T scores for TH, FN, IT, and TR were 0.36, 0.40, 0.39, and 0.49, respectively. This study shows that results from QCT aBMD appropriately adjusted can be evaluated against NHANES reference data to diagnose osteoporosis.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The importance of calculating absolute rather than relative fracture riskBone, 2007
- Geometric Indices of Bone Strength Are Associated With Physical Activity and Dietary Calcium Intake in Healthy Older WomenJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2007
- Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scansOsteoporosis International, 2006
- Precision Error of Fan-Beam Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Scans at Spine, Hip, and ForearmJournal of Clinical Densitometry, 2000
- An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis with DensitometryOsteoporosis International, 2000
- Prevalence of Low Femoral Bone Density in Older U.S. Adults from NHANES IIIJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Universal Standardization of Bone Density Measurements: A Method with Optimal Properties for Calibration Among Several InstrumentsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997
- Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration resultsJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1994
- Conversion relations for quantitative CT bone mineral densities measured with solid and liquid calibration standardsBone and Mineral, 1992
- Precise Measurement of Vertebral Mineral Content Using Computed TomographyJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1980