The impact of adjusting for reliability on hospital quality rankings in vascular surgery
- 31 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 53 (1), 1-5
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.031
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward Robust Information: Data Quality and Inter-Rater Reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2010
- Composite Measures For Predicting Surgical Mortality In The HospitalHealth Affairs, 2009
- Comparison of “Risk-Adjusted” Hospital OutcomesCirculation, 2008
- The Zero Mortality Paradox in SurgeryJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2008
- Quality Measurement in Adult Cardiac Surgery: Part 1—Conceptual Framework and Measure SelectionThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Massachusetts Cardiac Surgery Report Card: Implications of Statistical MethodologyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2005
- The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Non-Veterans Administration HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- The Unreliability of Individual Physician "Report Cards" for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic DiseaseJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1999
- The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIPAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structureJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1997