Designing and evaluating analytical parameters to adapt siemens urinary creatinine enzymatic method to open system analysers
Open Access
- 17 September 2020
- journal article
- Published by Peertechz Publications Private Limited in Open Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Vol. 4 (1), 029-033
- https://doi.org/10.17352/ojabc.000021
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation and comparison of Abbott Jaffe and enzymatic creatinine methods: Could the old method meet the new requirements?Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2017
- The analytical change in plasma creatinine that constitutes a biologic/physiologic changeClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2016
- A Risk Assessment of the Jaffe vs Enzymatic Method for Creatinine Measurement in an Outpatient PopulationPLOS ONE, 2015
- Enzymatic but not compensated Jaffe methods reach the desirable specifications of NKDEP at normal levels of creatinine. Results of the French multicentric evaluationClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2013
- Effect of picric acid and enzymatic creatinine on the efficiency of the glomerular filtration rate predicator formula.Clinical Laboratory, 2013
- Prime Time for Enzymatic Creatinine Methods in PediatricsClinical Chemistry, 2009
- Comparison between the enzymatic vitros assay for creatinine determination and three other methods adapted on the olympus analyzerJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 2003
- Automated Enzymatic Methods for Creatinine Measurement with Special Attention to Bilirubin Interferencecclm, 1993
- Evaluation of an enzymatic method for determining creatinine in plasma.Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1988