Methods of Estimation of Visceral Fat: Advantages of Ultrasonography
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Obesity Research
- Vol. 11 (12), 1488-1494
- https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2003.199
Abstract
Objective: To compare methods for the assessment of visceral fat with computed tomography (CT) and establish cutoffs to define visceral obesity based on such alternative methods.Research Methods and Procedures: One hundred women (50.4 +/- 7.7 years; BMI 39.2 +/- 5.4 kg/m(2)) underwent anthropometric evaluation, bioelectrical impedance, DXA, abdominal ultrasonography (US), and CT scan.Results: Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and US-determined visceral fat values showed the best correlation coefficients with visceral fat determined by CT (r = 0.55, 0.54, and 0.71, respectively; p < 0.01). Fat mass determined by DXA was inversely correlated with visceral-to-subcutaneous-fat ratio (r = -0.47, p < 0.01). Bioimpedance-determined fat mass and skinfolds were correlated with only subcutaneous abdominal fat quantified by CT. Linear regression indicated US visceral-fat distance and WHR as the main predictors of CT-determined visceral fat (adjusted r(2) = 0.51, p < 0.01). A waist measurement of 107 cm (82.7% specificity, 60.6% sensitivity) and WHR of 0.97 (78.8% specificity, 63.8% sensitivity) were chosen as discriminator values corresponding with visceral obesity diagnosed by CT. A value of 6.90 cm for visceral fat US-determined diagnosed visceral obesity with a specificity of 82.8%, a sensitivity of 69.2%, and a diagnostic concordance of 74% with CT.Discussion: US seemed to be the best alternative method for the assessment of intra-abdominal fat in obese women. Its diagnostic value could be optimized by an anthropometric measurement. Prospective studies are needed to establish CT and US cutoffs for defining visceral-fat levels related to elevated cardiovascular risk.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Radiol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Radiol, São Paulo, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Dept Prevent Med, São Paulo, BrazilWeb of SciencKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Abdominal adiposity values associated with established body mass indexes in white, black and hispanic Americans. A study from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Visceral fat and insulin resistance — causative or correlative?British Journal of Nutrition, 2000
- Measurement of visceral adipose tissue by DXA combined with anthropometry in obese humansInternational Journal of Obesity, 2000
- Visceral adiposity and incident coronary heart disease in Japanese-American men. The 10-year follow-up results of the Seattle Japanese-American Community Diabetes Study.Diabetes Care, 1999
- Body-Mass Index and Mortality in a Prospective Cohort of U.S. AdultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness— a critical reviewInternational Journal of Obesity, 1998
- Is it possible to derive a reliable estimate of human visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from simple anthropometric measurements?Metabolism, 1995
- Effects of Diet and Physical Activity on Adiposity and Body Fat Distribution: Implications for the Prevention of Cardiovascular DiseaseNutrition Research Reviews, 1993
- The contribution of sonography to the measurement of intra‐abdominal fatJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1990
- Treatment of obesity: An overviewDiabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 1988