THE IMPACT OF PROVIDER VOLUME ON OUTCOMES FROM UROLOGICAL CANCER THERAPY
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 174 (2), 432-438
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000165340.53381.48
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests an association between higher hospital and surgeon volumes, and better outcomes after high risk surgical procedures. We reviewed the literature on volume and outcomes, specifically in urological cancer therapy. We searched the literature from 1966 to 2004 using MEDLINE with the keywords outcomes, urology, neoplasms, volume, hospital volume, surgeon volume, prostatectomy, cystectomy, nephrectomy, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, kidney cancer and testis cancer. Relevant articles were reviewed and results were compared for each urological cancer. Several studies demonstrated that higher hospital volume is associated with better outcomes for all urological cancer surgeries. We found that long-term morbidity associated with radical prostatectomy is significantly associated with individual surgeon volume. There were variations in outcome even among high volume surgeons, suggesting that surgical technique can independently impact outcome. Hospitals with a high volume of cystectomies and nephrectomies had decreased overall mortality rates compared with low volume hospitals. Patients undergoing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for metastatic germ cell tumor had statistically significantly improved survival when treated at larger oncology centers. Evidence that high volume hospitals have better outcomes is increasing for urological cancer surgeries. Whether volume affects quality or better clinicians and services attract more patients can be debated. Centralizing health care will have major health policy implications, ie high volume hospitals may be overwhelmed and low volume hospitals may be at a disadvantage. An alternative would be to attempt to improve outcomes at low volume hospitals by identifying drivers of high quality care at high volume hospitals and transferring some of these characteristics.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the LiteratureAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Hospital and Physician Volume or Specialization and Outcomes in Cancer Treatment: Importance in Quality of Cancer CareJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- THE EFFECT OF HOSPITAL VOLUME ON MORTALITY AND RESOURCE USE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2000
- Selective Referral to High-Volume HospitalsJAMA, 2000
- Population-Based Study of Relationships Between Hospital Volume of Prostatectomies, Patient Outcomes, and Length of Hospital StayJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1999
- Impact of Hospital Volume on Operative Mortality for Major Cancer SurgeryJAMA, 1998
- Effects of Surgeon Volume and Hospital Volume on Quality of Care in HospitalsMedical Care, 1987
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979