An experiment with a modified whole language approach in first‐grade classrooms
- 1 March 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Reading Research and Instruction
- Vol. 30 (3), 21-38
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19388079109558048
Abstract
The “whole language” movement is the most discussed trend in language arts education today. Most educators resonate with classroom practices proposed by whole language advocates. Some, however, believe that the position taken against the direct teaching of phonics skills by whole language enthusiasts is ill‐advised, especially for first‐grade children. A recent review of studies comparing whole language approaches with basal approaches suggests that whole language approaches may not be as effective as basals in helping students master the word recognition skills prerequisite to effective comprehension. A modified whole language approach, focusing more directly on word recognition skills, was developed, implemented, and tested in three first‐grade classrooms in Provo, Utah. Nine of ten characteristics generally associated with whole language approaches were kept intact in the modified program. However, a daily 15‐minute period of total class phonics instruction was added to the program, which is not characteristic of whole language approaches. The year‐long study compared the reading achievement effects of the “modified whole language” approach implemented in three classrooms in one school with those obtained from a popular basal approach implemented in three classrooms in a second school in the same school district. Both schools were matched according to student achievement, socio‐economic background, and student turnover. A posttest‐only control group with a pretest covariate research design was used. Vocabulary and comprehension were measured using the Gates‐MacGinitie Reading Test, Level A, Form 1. Phonics and reading attitudes were measured using author‐developed instruments. All tests were administered to all students in September and in May. Students involved in the modified whole language program made greater achievement gains in phonics, vocabulary, reading comprehension, and total reading achievement than students in the basal program. Attitudes toward reading were significantly better in the modified whole language program than in the basal program.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984
- Analysis of Oral Reading Errors Made by Economically Disadvantaged Students Taught with a Synthetic-Phonics ApproachReading Research Quarterly, 1984
- The Reading Diary: Acquisition of DecodingReading Research Quarterly, 1981
- The role of letter recognition in word recognitionMemory & Cognition, 1976
- Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word-attack skills.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976
- Oral Reading Errors of First Grade Children Taught by a Code Emphasis ApproachReading Research Quarterly, 1974
- The Influence of Instructional Conditions on Word Recognition ErrorsReading Research Quarterly, 1972
- The Development of the Use of Graphic and Contextual Information as Children Learn to ReadReading Research Quarterly, 1970
- The Cooperative Research Program in First-Grade Reading InstructionReading Research Quarterly, 1967
- THE TIME IT TAKES TO SEE AND NAME OBJECTSMind, 1886