Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and Participation in Decision Making: Ethical Considerations for Professional–Client Practice
- 1 April 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD) in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
- Vol. 48 (2), 112-125
- https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.2.112
Abstract
In this article, the authors challenge professionals to re-examine assumptions about basic concepts and their implications in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The authors focus on decisions with significant implications, such as planning transition from school to adult life, changing living environments, and managing health issues. The analysis highlights important concepts that are less often addressed: autonomy, empowerment, participation in decision making, asymmetrical power, outer-directedness, and respect for persons. The authors suggest that professionals adopt a moral principle of respect for persons as an overarching guiding principle in their work with adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The value of self-determination and person-centered planning processes are placed in the larger scope of ethical practice. The authors offer a set of practical considerations that encourage respect for these individuals by involving them in the decision-making process in situations that have a large impact on them.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Surgeon-Patient Interaction in Older Women With Breast Cancer: What Are the Determinants of a Helpful Discussion?Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2006
- Empowering words, disempowering actions: an analysis of interactions between staff members and people with learning disabilities in residents’ meetingsJournal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2005
- Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2005
- Procedural Autonomy and Liberal LegitimacyPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2005
- Lessons About Autonomy from the Experience of DisabilitySocial Theory and Practice, 2001
- Patient Preferences for Medical Decision MakingMedical Care, 2000
- The capacity of people with a ‘mental disability’ to make a health care decisionPsychological Medicine, 2000
- Autonomy in Residential Facilities and Community Functioning of Adults With Mental RetardationMental Retardation, 1999
- The sensitivity theory of motivation: Implications for psychopathologyBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1996
- Patient Information-Seeking Behaviors When Communicating With DoctorsMedical Care, 1990