Measuring postoperative recovery: What are clinically meaningful differences?
- 1 August 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Surgery
- Vol. 156 (2), 319-327
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.005
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of a physical activity questionnaire (CHAMPS) as an indicator of postoperative recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgery, 2009
- Reporting of minimum clinically important differences in surgical trialsAnz Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Validating the Six-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Recovery After Elective Colon Resection SurgeryArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2008
- Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2008
- Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methodsThe Spine Journal, 2007
- Evaluating Surgical OutcomesSurgical Clinics of North America, 2006
- The quality of quality of life studies in general surgical journalsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2001
- Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.BMJ, 1992
- Measurement of health status: Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControlled Clinical Trials, 1989
- Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.American Journal of Public Health, 1982