Internal quality control: best practice
- 26 September 2013
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 66 (12), 1027-1032
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201661
Abstract
There is a wide variation in laboratory practice with regard to implementation and review of internal quality control (IQC). A poor approach can lead to a spectrum of scenarios from validation of incorrect patient results to over investigation of falsely rejected analytical runs. This article will provide a practical approach for the routine clinical biochemistry laboratory to introduce an efficient quality control system that will optimise error detection and reduce the rate of false rejection. Each stage of the IQC system is considered, from selection of IQC material to selection of IQC rules, and finally the appropriate action to follow when a rejection signal has been obtained. The main objective of IQC is to ensure day-to-day consistency of an analytical process and thus help to determine whether patient results are reliable enough to be released. The required quality and assay performance varies between analytes as does the definition of a clinically significant error. Unfortunately many laboratories currently decide what is clinically significant at the troubleshooting stage. Assay-specific IQC systems will reduce the number of inappropriate sample-run rejections compared with the blanket use of one IQC rule. In practice, only three or four different IQC rules are required for the whole of the routine biochemistry repertoire as assays are assigned into groups based on performance. The tools to categorise performance and assign IQC rules based on that performance are presented. Although significant investment of time and education is required prior to implementation, laboratories have shown that such systems achieve considerable reductions in cost and labour.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2010 convocation of experts on laboratory qualitycclm, 2011
- Commutability Limitations Influence Quality Control Results with Different Reagent LotsClinical Chemistry, 2011
- Practical application of Sigma Metrics QC procedures in clinical chemistrycclm, 2011
- Establishment of Outcome-Related Analytic Performance GoalsClinical Chemistry, 2010
- Unanticipated error in HbA1c measurement on the HLC-723 G7 analyzerClinical Biochemistry, 2010
- The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicineAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2009
- Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2009 convocation of experts on quality controlcclm, 2009
- Audit of internal quality control practice and processes in the south-east of England and suggested regional standardsAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2008
- Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategiesAnnals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2003
- External quality assessment of clinical laboratories in the United KingdomJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1981