Diagnostic accuracy of a clinical carotid plaque MR protocol using a neurovascular coil compared to a surface coil protocol
- 25 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Vol. 48 (5), 1264-1272
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25984
Abstract
Background Carotid plaque imaging with MRI is becoming more commonplace, but practical challenges exist in performing plaque imaging with surface coils. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of a carotid plaque MRI protocol using a standard neurovascular coil (Neurovascular Coil Protocol) to a higher‐resolution carotid plaque MRI using carotid surface coils (Surface Coil Protocol) in characterizing carotid plaque. Study Type Prospective study comparing two MR techniques in plaque characterization. Population Thirty‐eight consecutive carotid artery disease patients. Field Strength/Sequence Patients underwent 3T MRI using 1) a Neurovascular Coil Protocol including the following sequences: 3D‐FSE T1 pre/postcontrast and precontrast 3D IR‐FSPGR, and 2) a Surface Coil Protocol using standard multicontrast MRI sequences. Assessment Plaque characteristics analyzed by two independent neuroradiologists included intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid‐rich necrotic‐core (LRNC), and thin/ruptured fibrous cap (TRFC). Statistical Tests Diagnostic performance of the Neurovascular Coil Protocol was compared to the Surface Coil Protocol reference standard using receiver‐operating curves. Results For IPH, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of the Neurovascular Coil Protocol were 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 78.8–97.5%), 87.0% (95% CI = 66.4–97.2%), and 0.92, respectively. For LRNC without IPH sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 73.3% (95% CI = 44.9–92.2%), 85.7% (95% CI = 67.3–96.0%), and 0.84, respectively. For TRFC, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 35.3% (95% CI = 14.2–61.7%), 97.6% (95% CI = 87.4–99.9%), and 0.66 respectively. Interobserver agreement for IPH, LRNC, and TRFC using the Neurovascular Coil Protocol were k = 0.87 (95% CI = 0.75–0.99), k = 0.54 (95% CI = 0.29–0.80), and k = 0.41 (95% CI = 0.08–0.74), respectively. Data Conclusion Our Neurovascular Coil Protocol has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in identifying IPH and LRNC but is limited in assessment of TRFC. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.Keywords
Funding Information
- Radiological Society of North America
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Carotid Plaque Hemorrhage on Cerebrovascular Events by Magnetic Resonance ImagingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013
- Biological Signatures of Asymptomatic Extra- and Intracranial AtherosclerosisStroke, 2012
- Prevalence of Nonstenosing, Complicated Atherosclerotic Plaques in Cryptogenic StrokeJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2012
- Assessment of Carotid Plaque Stability Based on the Dynamic Enhancement Pattern in Plaque Components With Multidetector CT AngiographyStroke, 2012
- Association Between Carotid Plaque Characteristics and Subsequent Ischemic Cerebrovascular EventsStroke, 2006
- The Need for Urgency in Identification and Treatment of Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Is Already EstablishedCerebrovascular Diseases, 2005
- Hemorrhage in the Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque: A High-Resolution MRI StudyStroke, 2004
- Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis StudyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Resolving the controversyJAMA, 1995
- Efficacy of Carotid Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993