The Influence of Environmental, Biotic and Spatial Factors on Diatom Metacommunity Structure in Swedish Headwater Streams
Open Access
- 15 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (8), e72237
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072237
Abstract
Stream assemblages are structured by a combination of local (environmental filtering and biotic interactions) and regional factors (e.g., dispersal related processes). The relative importance of environmental and spatial (i.e., regional) factors structuring stream assemblages has been frequently assessed in previous large-scale studies, but biotic predictors (potentially reflecting local biotic interactions) have rarely been included. Diatoms may be useful for studying the effect of trophic interactions on community structure since: (1) a majority of experimental studies shows significant grazing effects on diatom species composition, and (2) assemblages can be divided into guilds that have different susceptibility to grazing. We used a dataset from boreal headwater streams in south-central Sweden (covering a spatial extent of ∼14000 km2), which included information about diatom taxonomic composition, abundance of invertebrate grazers (biotic factor), environmental (physicochemical) and spatial factors (obtained through spatial eigenfunction analyses). We assessed the relative importance of environmental, biotic, and spatial factors structuring diatom assemblages, and performed separate analyses on different diatom guilds. Our results showed that the diatom assemblages were mainly structured by environmental factors. However, unique spatial and biological gradients, specific to different guilds and unrelated to each other, were also evident. We conclude that biological predictors, in combination with environmental and spatial variables, can reveal a more complete picture of the local vs. regional control of species assemblages in lotic environments. Biotic factors should therefore not be overlooked in applied research since they can capture additional local control and therefore increase accuracy and performance of predictive models. The inclusion of biotic predictors did, however, not significantly influence the unique fraction explained by spatial factors, which suggests low bias in previous assessments of unique regional control of stream assemblages.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream networkJournal of Animal Ecology, 2012
- The recovery of acid‐damaged zooplankton communities in Canadian Lakes: the relative importance of abiotic, biotic and spatial variablesFreshwater Biology, 2012
- Recovery of Soil Water, Groundwater, and Streamwater From Acidification at the Swedish Integrated Monitoring CatchmentsAMBIO, 2011
- Modelling the effect of directional spatial ecological processes at different scalesOecologia, 2010
- Spatial autocorrelation and dispersal limitation in freshwater organismsOecologia, 2008
- The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi‐scale community ecologyEcology Letters, 2004
- Hypothesis: The Rate and Scale of Dispersal of Freshwater Diatom Species is a Function of their Global AbundanceProtist, 2002
- All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matricesEcological Modelling, 2002
- Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species dataOecologia, 2001
- Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of species interactionsFreshwater Biology, 1984