How do quantities drunk per drinking day and the frequencies of drinking those quantities contribute to self-reported harm and positive consequences?
Open Access
- 31 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Alcohol and Alcoholism
- Vol. 42 (6), 610-617
- https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agm066
Abstract
Aims: This article examines how quantities drunk per drinking day (dose) and the frequency of drinking those quantities affect self-reported harm and positive consequences at the individual and population level. Methods: Participants were drinkers in a general population survey among Finns aged 15–69 years, conducted in 2000 (N = 1760, response rate 78%). Types of harm examined were self-reported worries over drinking control, negative consequences of individual drinking occasions, and external reactions to drinking. Results: Respondents who reported frequent drinking at very high doses (13 drinks and above for men, 8 and above for women) were in a league of their own with respect to the risk of harm. At the population level, the dose of 8–12 drinks accounted for most problems among men, and doses of 5–7 and 3–4 drinks among women. No gain in positive consequences was attached to drinking beyond the dose of 5–7 drinks among men and 3–4 drinks among women. Conclusions: The dose level at which the population-level risk was the highest was lower than the level at which the individual-level risk was the highest, due to a greater prevalence of drinking the lesser quantities. Future studies should pay more attention to the separate effects of dose as well as the frequency of drinking the particular doses per occasion at the individual level, and also, as to how the prevalence of these drinking patterns contributes to the population-level risk.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of correcting for nonresponse by weighting on estimates of alcohol consumption.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2003
- Understanding college drinking: assessing dose response from survey self-reports.Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2003
- Revising the preventive paradox: the Swiss caseAddiction, 2001
- Relationships of drinking behaviour, gender and age with reported negative and positive experiences related to drinkingAddiction, 2000
- Drunkenness, feeling the effects and 5 + measuresAddiction, 1999
- Overview of studies on drinking patterns and consequencesAddiction, 1996
- The reward structure of drinking among younger and older male drinkersContemporary Drug Problems, 1996
- Positive and Negative Experiences Related to Drinking as a Function of Annual Alcohol IntakeBritish Journal of Addiction, 1988
- Demographic Characteristics and the Frequency of Heavy Drinking as Predictors of Self‐reported Drinking ProblemsBritish Journal of Addiction, 1987
- Alcohol Consumption and the Preventive Paradox★British Journal of Addiction, 1986