Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage
Open Access
- 2 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (10), e77006
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077006
Abstract
A general fact about language is that subject relative clauses are easier to process than object relative clauses. Recently, several self-paced reading studies have presented surprising evidence that object relatives in Chinese are easier to process than subject relatives. We carried out three self-paced reading experiments that attempted to replicate these results. Two of our three studies found a subject-relative preference, and the third study found an object-relative advantage. Using a random effects bayesian meta-analysis of fifteen studies (including our own), we show that the overall current evidence for the subject-relative advantage is quite strong (approximate posterior probability of a subject-relative advantage given the data: 78–80%). We argue that retrieval/integration based accounts would have difficulty explaining all three experimental results. These findings are important because they narrow the theoretical space by limiting the role of an important class of explanation—retrieval/integration cost—at least for relative clause processing in Chinese.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximalJournal of Memory and Language, 2013
- Processing Chinese relative clauses in contextLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 2013
- Relative clause processing in Mandarin: Evidence from the maze taskLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 2012
- Subject preference and ergativityLingua, 2012
- In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2011
- Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from BasqueCognition, 2010
- Reading relative clauses in EnglishCognitive Linguistics, 2005
- Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel?: Evidence from event-related brain potentialsCognitive Brain Research, 2003
- Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple SequencesStatistical Science, 1992
- Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990