Body mass index kinetics and risk factors of malnutrition one year after radical oesophagectomy for cancer

Abstract

Malnutrition is common after oesophageal cancer surgery. This study aims to investigate body mass index (BMI) kinetics and the risk factors of malnutrition among 1-year disease-free survivors after radical transthoracic oesophagectomy for cancer. From a prospective single-institution database, 118 1-year disease-free survivors having undergone a R0 transthoracic oesophagectomy with gastric tubulization between 2000 and 2008 were identified retrospectively. BMI values were collected at the onset of the disease (pre-treatment BMI), at the time of surgery (preoperative BMI), at postoperative 6 months and 1 year after oesophagectomy (1-year BMI). Logistic regression was performed with adjustment for confounders to estimate odds ratios of the factors associated with a 1-year weight loss (WL) of at least 15% of the pre-treatment body weight (BW). At the onset of the disease, 5 patients (4%) were underweighted (BMI < 8.5 kg/m²), 65 (55%) were normal (BMI = 18.5–24.9 kg/m²), 36 (31%) were overweighted (BMI > 25 kg/m²) and 12 (10%) were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²). Mean pre-treatment, preoperative, postoperative 6-month and 1-year BMI values were 24.64 ± 4 kg/m², 23.55 ± 3.8 kg/m², 21.7 ± 3 kg/m² and 21.97 ± 4 kg/m², respectively. One-year WL ≥ 15% of the pre-treatment BW was present in 29 patients (25%): 18 among the 48 patients (37%) with a pre-treatment BMI ≥ 25 and 11 among the 70 patients (15%) with pre-treatment BMI < 25 (P = 0.006). On logistic regression, initial overweighting was the sole independent prognosticator of 1-year postoperative WL of at least 15% of the pre-treatment BW (P = 0.039; OR: 2.96, [1.06–8.32]). Postoperative malnutrition remains a severe problem after oesophageal cancer resection, even in long-term disease-free survivors. Overweight and obese patients are the segment population most exposed to this postoperative malnutrition, suggesting that such surgery could have substantial bariatric effect. A special vigilance programme on the nutritional status of this sub-group of patients should be the rule.