Proximal Femur Mechanical Adaptation to Weight Gain in Late Adolescence: A Six-Year Longitudinal Study
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 23 (2), 180-188
- https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.071018
Abstract
The effect of weight gain in late adolescence on bone is not clear. Young women who consistently gained weight (n = 23) from 17 to 22 yr of age had increased BMD but a lack of subperiosteal expansion compared with stable weight peers (n = 48). Bone strength increased appropriately for lean mass in both groups but decreased relative to body weight in weight gainers, suggesting increased bone fragility in weight gainers. Weight gain leading to obesity often starts in adolescence, yet little is known about its effects on bone. We used longitudinal data to examine the effects of weight gain in late adolescence (from 17 to 22 yr of age) on proximal femur BMD, geometry, and estimates of bending strength. Participants were classified as either weight gainers (WG, n = 23) or stable weight (SW, n = 48) using a random coefficients model. Weight gainers had positive increases in weight (p < 0.05) at each clinic visit from age 17 onward. Proximal femur DXA scans (Hologic QDR 2000) taken annually from 17 to 22 yr of age were analyzed for areal BMD (g/cm(2)), subperiosteal width (cm), and bone cross-sectional area (CSA) at the proximal femoral shaft. Cortical thickness was measured, and section modulus (Z, cm(3)) was calculated as a measure of bone bending strength. Total body lean (g) and fat (g) mass were measured from DXA total body scans. Over ages 17-22, height remained stable in both groups. Weight remained static in the SW group but increased 14% on average in the WG group (p < 0.05). After controlling for age 17 baseline values, WG had higher BMD (+2.6%), thicker cortices (+3.6%), and greater bone CSA (+2.3%). Increased BMD did not translate to greater increases in bone bending strength (Z). The SW group achieved similar gains in Z by greater subperiosteal expansion. Bone strength index (SI = Z/height) normalized for body weight remained constant in the SW group but decreased significantly in the WG group. In contrast, SI normalized to lean mass did not change over time in either group. Other variables including physical activity, nutrition, and hormone levels (estradiol, testosterone, cortisol) did not differ significantly between groups. These data suggest that weight gain in late adolescence may inhibit the periosteal expansion known to normally occur throughout life in long bones, resulting in decreased bone strength relative to body weight.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association Between Bone Mass and Fractures in Children: A Prospective Cohort StudyJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2006
- Calcium plus Vitamin D Supplementation and the Risk of FracturesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- The ‘muscle-bone unit’ during the pubertal growth spurtBone, 2004
- Structural Adaptation to Changing Skeletal Load in the Progression Toward Hip Fragility: The Study of Osteoporotic FracturesJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2001
- Have the DXA-Based Exercise Studies Seriously Underestimated the Effects of Mechanical Loading on Bone?Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1999
- Influences on skeletal mineralization in children and adolescents: Evidence for varying effects of sexual maturation and physical activityThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Scaling of long bone fracture strength with animal massJournal of Biomechanics, 1989
- Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodellingJournal of Biomechanics, 1984
- Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometryJournal of Biomechanics, 1984