A comparison of DNA- and RNA-based clone libraries from the same marine bacterioplankton community
Open Access
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in FEMS Microbiology Ecology
- Vol. 51 (3), 341-352
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.09.012
Abstract
Clones from the same marine bacterioplankton community were sequenced, 100 clones based on DNA (16S rRNA genes) and 100 clones based on RNA (16S rRNAKeywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Different SAR86 subgroups harbour divergent proteorhodopsinsEnvironmental Microbiology, 2004
- Fine-scale phylogenetic architecture of a complex bacterial communityNature, 2004
- Oceans of bacteriaNature, 2004
- Estimating prokaryotic diversity: When are 16S rDNA libraries large enough?Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 2004
- High overall diversity and dominance of microdiverse relationships in salt marsh sulphate‐reducing bacteriaEnvironmental Microbiology, 2004
- Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton cladeNature, 2002
- Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in BacteriologyInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1994
- Single‐cell RNA content of natural marine planktonic bacteria measured by hybridization with multiple 16S rRNA‐targeted fluorescent probesLimnology and Oceanography, 1994
- Phylogenetic diversity of aggregate‐attached vs. free‐living marine bacterial assemblagesLimnology and Oceanography, 1993
- THE POPULATION FREQUENCIES OF SPECIES AND THE ESTIMATION OF POPULATION PARAMETERSBiometrika, 1953