The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation
Open Access
- 26 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (6), e65782
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065782
Abstract
Opt-in surveys are the most widespread method used to study participation in online communities, but produce biased results in the absence of adjustments for non-response. A 2008 survey conducted by the Wikimedia Foundation and United Nations University at Maastricht is the source of a frequently cited statistic that less than 13% of Wikipedia contributors are female. However, the same study suggested that only 39.9% of Wikipedia readers in the US were female – a finding contradicted by a representative survey of American adults by the Pew Research Center conducted less than two months later. Combining these two datasets through an application and extension of a propensity score estimation technique used to model survey non-response bias, we construct revised estimates, contingent on explicit assumptions, for several of the Wikimedia Foundation and United Nations University at Maastricht claims about Wikipedia editors. We estimate that the proportion of female US adult editors was 27.5% higher than the original study reported (22.7%, versus 17.8%), and that the total proportion of female editors was 26.8% higher (16.1%, versus 12.7%).Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tea and sympathyPublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2013
- Conflict, criticism, or confidencePublished by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) ,2012
- Estimating Propensity Adjustments for Volunteer Web SurveysSociological Methods & Research, 2011
- National Surveys Via Rdd Telephone Interviewing Versus the InternetPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2009
- Selection Bias in Web Surveys and the Use of Propensity ScoresSociological Methods & Research, 2009
- Estimation for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys Using Propensity Score Adjustment and Calibration AdjustmentSociological Methods & Research, 2009
- THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1Information, Communication & Society, 2008
- The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and FreedomThe Yale Law Journal, 2007
- A Comparison Between Responses From a Propensity-Weighted Web Survey and an Identical RDD SurveySocial Science Computer Review, 2004
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983