The price of your soul: neural evidence for the non-utilitarian representation of sacred values
Open Access
- 5 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Philosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 367 (1589), 754-762
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0262
Abstract
Sacred values, such as those associated with religious or ethnic identity, underlie many important individual and group decisions in life, and individuals typically resist attempts to trade off their sacred values in exchange for material benefits. Deontological theory suggests that sacred values are processed based on rights and wrongs irrespective of outcomes, while utilitarian theory suggests that they are processed based on costs and benefits of potential outcomes, but which mode of processing an individual naturally uses is unknown. The study of decisions over sacred values is difficult because outcomes cannot typically be realized in a laboratory, and hence little is known about the neural representation and processing of sacred values. We used an experimental paradigm that used integrity as a proxy for sacredness and which paid real money to induce individuals to sell their personal values. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found that values that people refused to sell (sacred values) were associated with increased activity in the left temporoparietal junction and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, regions previously associated with semantic rule retrieval. This suggests that sacred values affect behaviour through the retrieval and processing of deontic rules and not through a utilitarian evaluation of costs and benefits.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sacred Barriers to Conflict ResolutionScience, 2007
- Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflictProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007
- The neural basis of human moral cognitionNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2005
- The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral JudgmentNeuron, 2004
- Moral cognition and its neural constituentsNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2003
- Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitionsTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003
- How (and where) does moral judgment work?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2002
- Protected ValuesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- Preferences, information and biodiversity preservationEcological Economics, 1995
- Equilibrium points in n -person gamesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1950