Features, Syntax, and Categories in the Latin Perfect
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 31 (2), 185-230
- https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554343
Abstract
The analysis centers on the notion of category in synthetic and analytic verbal forms and on the status of the feature that determines the forms of the Latin perfect. In this part of the Latin verbal system, active forms are synthetic (“verbs”) but passive forms are analytic (i.e., participle and finite auxiliary). I show that the two perfects occur in essentially the same structure and are distinguished by a difference in movement to T; moreover, the difference in forms can be derived without reference to category labels like “Verb” or “Adjective” on the Root. In addition, the difference in perfects is determined by a feature with clear syntactic consequences, which must be associated arbitrarily with certain Roots, the deponent verbs. I discuss the implications of these points in the context of Distributed Morphology, the theory in which the analysis is framed.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Passive and Stative in Chichewa: Evidence for Modular Distinctions in GrammarLanguage, 1996
- TOWARD A SYNTAX OF TEMPORAL REPRESENTATIONSProbus, 1991
- Psych-verbs and ?-theoryNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1988
- Disjunctive ordering in inflectional morphologyNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1986
- Reflections on the Indo-European medium IILingua, 1961
- Reflections on the Indo-European medium ILingua, 1961
- Die mit dem Suffix -to- gebildeten Partizipia im Verbal-system des Lateinischen und des Umbrisch-Oskischen. Eine syntaktische Untersuchung.Indogermanische Forschungen, 1895