Effects of Pre‐structuring Discussion Threads on Group Interaction and Group Performance in Computer‐supported Collaborative Argumentation
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in Distance Education
- Vol. 27 (3), 371-390
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910600940448
Abstract
This study examined the effects of pre‐structuring discussion threads on group performance in computer‐supported collaborative argumentation where students labeled their messages as arguments, challenges, supporting evidence, and explanations on a threaded discussion board. In the pre‐structured group students were required to post supporting and opposing arguments to designated and separate discussion threads. In the control group no discussion threads were designated for posting supporting and opposing arguments. The mean number of challenges elicited per argument was 64% greater with pre‐structured threads (ES = +.47). No significant differences were found in the mean number of counter‐challenges, supporting evidence, and explanations posted in reply to challenges. The findings suggest that prestructured discussion threads can increase the frequency of argument→challenge exchanges needed to initiate critical discourse.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Guide to Analyzing Message–Response Sequences and Group Interaction Patterns in Computer‐mediated CommunicationDistance Education, 2005
- The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in OnlineAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 2003
- Using CMC to Develop Argumentation Skills in Childre with a ‘Literacy Deficit’Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2003
- Constructive Discussions through Electronic DialoguePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2003
- CSCL, Argumentation, and Deweyan InquiryPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2003
- Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferencesPublished by Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) ,2002
- Fostering Students' Statistical and Scientific Thinking: Lessons Learned From an Innovative College CourseAmerican Educational Research Journal, 2000
- Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1999
- Collaborative learning through computer-mediated argumentationPublished by Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) ,1999
- Observing InteractionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1997