Low-pass genome sequencing versus chromosomal microarray analysis: implementation in prenatal diagnosis
- 26 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Genetics in Medicine
- Vol. 22 (3), 500-510
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0634-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81741004)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671470)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801042)
- Health and Medical Research Fund (04152666)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal DiagnosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Extensive genetic diversity and substructuring among zebrafish strains revealed through copy number variant analysisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- A copy number variation morbidity map of developmental delayNature Genetics, 2011
- Identification of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency and apparently normal karyotypeUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011
- Consensus Statement: Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital AnomaliesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2010
- Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transformBioinformatics, 2009
- PAnnBuilder: an R package for assembling proteomic annotation dataBioinformatics, 2009
- Variation in FTO contributes to childhood obesity and severe adult obesityNature Genetics, 2007
- Phenotype of triploid embryosJournal of Medical Genetics, 2005
- Prenatal ultrasound findings in a fetus with congenital contractural arachnodactylyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002