Rape and Accident Counterfactuals: Who Might Have Done Otherwise and Would It Have Changed the Outcome?1
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Social Psychology
- Vol. 26 (12), 1042-1067
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb01124.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Curry for Your Thoughts: Empathic Effects on Counterfactual ThinkingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- A Tale of Two Curries: Counterfactual Thinking and Accident-Related JudgmentsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1992
- Dirty tricks of cross-examination: The influence of conjectural evidence on the jury.Law and Human Behavior, 1990
- Mental simulation of causality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- The undoing of scenarios.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Counterfactual Thinking and Victim CompensationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1986
- The Knowledge of What Might have BeenPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1986
- Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.Psychological Review, 1986
- Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1982
- Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980