Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking
Top Cited Papers
- 21 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 22 (4), 545-552
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611402512
Abstract
Argumentive reasoning skills are featured in the new K–12 Common Standards (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2010), yet with little said about their nature or how to instill them. Distinguishing reasoning skills from writing skills, we report on a multiyear intervention that used electronically conducted dialogues on social issues as the medium to develop argumentive reasoning skills in two cohorts of young adolescents. Intervention groups demonstrated transfer of the dialogic activity to two individual essays on new topics; argument quality for these groups exceeded that of comparison groups who participated in an intervention involving the more face-valid activity of extensive essay writing practice, along with whole-class discussion. The intervention group also demonstrated greater awareness of the relevance of evidence to argument. The dialogic method thus appears to be a viable one for developing cognitive skills that the comparison-group data show do not routinely develop during this age period.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Argue? Developing Understanding of the Purposes and Values of Argumentive DiscourseDiscourse Processes, 2010
- Teaching and learning science as argumentScience Education, 2010
- Human Reasoning and Argumentation: The Probabilistic ApproachPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2008
- Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic LifeStudies in Philosophy and Education, 2007
- The Uses of ArgumentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,2003
- The Skills of ArgumentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- Dialogue theory for critical thinkingArgumentation, 1989