Gains to Mutual Fund Sponsors Offering Multiple Share Class Funds
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Financial Research
- Vol. 25 (1), 81-98
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.00005
Abstract
Although the number of mutual funds grew during the 1990s, much of the growth is attributable to the introduction of multiple share class (MS) funds. Proponents argue that the MS structure leads to cost savings, which can be passed onto investors as lower expenses. However, if the structure lowers costs, sponsors are likely to profit from it. Though investors are concerned about the base expense ratio, the sum of administrative and management fees, fund sponsors generate profits from the management fees. As such, they would prefer to increase the management fee if they can simultaneously lower administrative fees. Our results indicate that MS fund investors pay lower administrative fees, but management fees are approximately 7 basis points higher than single-class funds. Overall, base expense ratios are higher than for single-class funds, suggesting fund sponsors capture the cost benefits the MS structure provides. Our results are robust to different model specifications and different estimation techniques. Southern Finance Association and the Southwestern Finance Association.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE COST OF MUTUAL FUND DISTRIBUTION FEESJournal of Financial Research, 1998
- Mutual fund shareholders: characteristics, investor knowledge, and sources of informationFinancial Services Review, 1998
- Board structure and fee-setting in the U.S. mutual fund industryJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF MUTUAL FUND EXPENSESJournal of Financial Research, 1997
- On Persistence in Mutual Fund PerformanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- An individual level analysis of the mutual fund investment decisionJournal of Financial Services Research, 1996
- Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directorsJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- A RE‐EXAMINATION OF THE EFFECT OF 12B–1 PLANS ON MUTUAL FUND EXPENSE RATIOSJournal of Financial Research, 1994
- Outside directors and the adoption of poison pillsJournal of Financial Economics, 1994
- Mutual fund distribution fees: An empirical analysis of the impact of deregulationJournal of Financial Services Research, 1991