A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence
- 31 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Composites Science and Technology
- Vol. 62 (12-13), 1725-1797
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(02)00125-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of theory and experiment for the stress-based Grant–Sanders methodComposites Science and Technology, 2002
- The prediction of failure envelopes and stress/strain behavior of composite laminates: comparison with experimental resultsComposites Science and Technology, 2002
- A STRAIN-ENERGY BASED FAILURE CRITERION FOR NON-LINEAR ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE LAMINATES SUBJECTED TO BIAXIAL LOADINGComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- PREDICTING TRANSVERSE CRACK FORMATION IN CROSS-PLY LAMINATESComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- Predictions of a generalized maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminatesComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- Prediction of composite laminate fracture: micromechanics and progressive fractureComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- FAILURE CRITERIA FOR USE IN THE DESIGN ENVIRONMENTComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- A PROGRESSIVE QUADRATIC FAILURE CRITERION FOR A LAMINATEComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminatesComposites Science and Technology, 1998
- Prediction of failure envelopes and stress/strain behaviour of composite laminatesComposites Science and Technology, 1998