Predictors for the Selection of Patients for Abdominal CT After Blunt Trauma
- 1 March 2010
- journal article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 251 (3), 512-520
- https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181cfd342
Abstract
Objective: To select parameters that can predict which patients should receive abdominal computed tomography (CT) after high-energy blunt trauma. Summary Background Data: Abdominal CT accurately detects injuries of the abdomen, pelvis, and lumbar spine, but has important disadvantages. More evidence for an appropriate patient selection for CT is required. Methods: A prospective observational study was performed on consecutive adult high-energy blunt trauma patients. All patients received primary and secondary surveys according to the advanced trauma life support, sonography (focused assessment with sonography for trauma [FAST]), conventional radiography (CR) of the chest, pelvis, and spine and routine abdominal CT. Parameters from prehospital information, physical examination, laboratory investigations, FAST, and CR were prospectively recorded for all patients. Independent predictors for the presence of ≥1 injuries on abdominal CT were determined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1040 patients were included, 309 had injuries on abdominal CT. Nine parameters were independent predictors for injuries on CT: abnormal CR of the pelvis (odds ratio [OR], 46.8), lumbar spine (OR, 16.2), and chest (OR, 2.37), abnormal FAST (OR, 26.7), abnormalities in physical examination of the abdomen/pelvis (OR, 2.41) or lumbar spine (OR 2.53), base excess <−3 (OR, 2.39), systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg (OR, 3.81), and long bone fractures (OR, 1.61). The prediction model based on these predictors resulted in a R2 of 0.60, a sensitivity of 97%, and a specificity of 33%. A diagnostic algorithm was subsequently proposed, which could reduce CT usage with 22% as compared with a routine use. Conclusions: Based on parameters from physical examination, laboratory, FAST, and CR, we created a prediction model with a high sensitivity to select patients for abdominal CT after blunt trauma. A diagnostic algorithm was proposed.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Routine Versus Selective Computed Tomography of the Abdomen, Pelvis, and Lumbar Spine in Blunt Trauma: A Prospective EvaluationThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2009
- Added Value of Routine Chest MDCT After Blunt Trauma: Evaluation of Additional Findings and Impact on Patient ManagementAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2008
- Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation ExposureThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Health effects of ionising radiation from diagnostic CTThe Lancet, 2006
- Whole Body Imaging in Blunt Multisystem Trauma Patients Without Obvious Signs of InjuryArchives of Surgery, 2006
- The benefit of routine thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic computed tomography to evaluate trauma patients with closed head injuriesThe American Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Abdominal CT scanning for trauma: how low can we go?Injury, 2000
- The value of physical examination in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal trauma: a retrospective studyInjury, 1997
- Computed tomography and blunt abdominal injury: patient selection based on examination, haematocrit and haematuriaInjury, 1997
- Selective Use of Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage in Blunt Abdominal TraumaThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 1995