Does stent design affect probability of restenosis? A randomized trial comparing Multilink stents with GFX stents
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 142 (3), 445-451
- https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2001.117321
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does the specific intravascular ultrasound criterion used to optimize stent expansion have an impact on the probability of stent restenosis?The American Journal of Cardiology, 1999
- Intracoronary Multi-link stents: experience in 218 patients using aspirin aloneHeart, 1998
- Antiplatelet treatment with cilostazol after stent implantationHeart, 1998
- Intravascular ultrasound-guided optimized stent deployment Immediate and 6 months clinical and angiographic results from the Multicenter Ultrasound Stenting in Coronaries Study (MUSIC Study)Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1998
- Quantitative Coronary Angiographic and Intravascular Ultrasound Assessment of a New Nonarticulated Stent: Report From the Advanced Cardiovascular Systems MultiLink Stent Pilot StudyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Serial Follow-up After Optimized Ultrasound-Guided Deployment of Palmaz-Schatz StentsCirculation, 1997
- Endovascular Stent Design Dictates Experimental Restenosis and ThrombosisCirculation, 1995
- Intracoronary Stenting Without Anticoagulation Accomplished With Intravascular Ultrasound GuidanceCirculation, 1995
- Stent-induced Intimal Hyperplasia: Are There Fundamental Differences between Flexible and Rigid Stent Designs?Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 1994
- Effects of design geometry of intravascular endoprostheses on stenosis rate in normal rabbitsAmerican Heart Journal, 1992