Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability
- 1 January 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Learning and Individual Differences
- Vol. 18 (1), 89-107
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 89 references indexed in Scilit:
- Children can solve Bayesian problems: the role of representation in mental computationCognition, 2006
- How making a risk estimate can change the feel of that risk: shifting attitudes toward breast cancer risk in a general public surveyPatient Education and Counseling, 2005
- Irrational decisions: attending to numbers rather than ratiosPersonality and Individual Differences, 2003
- Frequency illusions and other fallaciesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2003
- Ecological and evolutionary validity: Comments on Johnson-Laird, Legrenzi, Girotto, Legrenzi, and Caverni's (1999) mental-model theory of extensional reasoning.Psychological Review, 2002
- Examining Models of Nondominated Decoy Effects across Judgment and ChoiceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2000
- The Interaction of Three Facets of Concrete Thinking in a Game of ChanceThinking & Reasoning, 1999
- Risk Communication: Absolute versus Relative Expressions of Low-Probability RisksOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994
- Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory ResultsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1978