Cross-modal attentional deficits in processing tactile stimulation

Abstract

In order to substantiate recent theorization on the possible links between the causes of the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period phenomena (e.g., Jolicoeur, 1999a), four experiments are reported in which two target stimuli, T₁ and T₂, were presented in different modalities at varying stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), with each stimulus being associated with a distinct task, Task₁ and Task₂. In Experiment 1, T₁ was a tone, and Task₁ was a speeded vocal response based on pitch. T₂ was a brief press applied to either of two distal fingerpads, and Task₂ was a speeded manual response based on tactile stimulus location. In Experiment 2, the same T₁ as that used in Experiment 1 was presented, and in Task₁ the subject either made a speeded vocal response based on pitch or ignored T₁. T₂ was a masked tactile stimulation, and Task₂ was an unspeeded manual discrimination of the tactile stimulation location. This Task₂ was maintained in Experiments 3 and 4. The auditory T₁ was replaced with a white digit embedded in a rapid serial visualization presentation of a stream of black letters, and in Task₁ the subject either made an unspeeded decision based on T₁ identity or ignored T₁. In all the experiments, the results showed an SOA-locked impairment in Task₂. As SOA was decreased, reaction times in the speeded Task₂ of Experiment 1 increased, and accuracy in the unspeeded Task₂ of Experiments 2–4 decreased. The SOA-locked impairment was almost eliminated when T₁ could be ignored or was absent. The results are discussed in terms of central processing limitations as the cause of such effects.