Incremental net benefit of lipid-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies
- 27 October 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 78 (3), 351-363
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-021-03242-6
Abstract
Introduction Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are monoclonal antibodies that lower lipid levels. Although several cardiovascular outcome trials reported the effectiveness of PCSK9i, the evidence on cost-effectiveness is mixed. We systematically reviewed the evidence and synthesized incremental net benefit (INB) to quantify pooled cost-effectiveness. Methods We systematically searched for full economic evaluation studies reporting outcomes of PCSK9i compared with other lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Tufts Registry for eligible studies up to August 2021, adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. We pooled INB in US$ with a 95% confidence interval using a random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. We used the modified economic evaluations bias (ECOBIAS) checklist to evaluate the quality of selected studies. Results Twenty-three studies were eligible, mainly from high-income countries (HIC). The pooled INB (INBp) of PCSK9i versus other lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies were estimated from n = 24 comparisons, with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.99). The INBp (95% CI) was $ − 78,207 (− 120,422; − 35,993) or € − 52,526 (− 80,879; − 24,174) (conversion factor 1 US$ = 0.67€) which shows that PCSK9i was not significantly cost-effective when compared to other standard therapies. On subgroup analysis PCSK9i was significantly not cost-effective [$ − 23,672 (− 24,061; − 23,282)] compared to other lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies in HICs, upper-middle-income countries [$ − 158,412 (− 241,738; − 75,086)] or when the target population was CVD [$ − 109,343 (− 158,968; − 59,717)]; and for treatment subgroup: against placebo or no treatment [$ − 79,018 (− 79,649; − 78,388 PCSK9)] and standard statin therapies [$ − 131,833 (− 173,449; − 90,216)]. The sensitivity analysis revealed that the findings are not robust for HICs and the treatment subgroups. Conclusion PCSK9 inhibitors are not cost-effective compared to other lipid-lowering pharmacotherapies in HICs. Further, current pieces of evidence are predominantly from HICs with largely lacking evidence from other economies. Prospero registration ID CRD42020206043.
Keywords
Funding Information
- dept of health research, govt of india (HTA-Resource centre grant)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174 000 participants in 27 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2015
- Very Low Levels of Atherogenic Lipoproteins and the Risk for Cardiovascular EventsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2014
- Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Adults: Synopsis of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Cholesterol GuidelineAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2014
- Lack of Effect of Lowering LDL Cholesterol on Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Individual Data from 175,000 People in 27 Randomised Trials of Statin TherapyPLOS ONE, 2012
- GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2009
- Long-Term Benefit of Statin Therapy Initiated??during Hospitalization for??an??Acute??Coronary SyndromeAmerican Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2007
- Statin-related adverse events: A meta-analysisClinical Therapeutics, 2006