Collective Action, Pluralism, and the Legitimacy Tariff: Corporate Activity or Inactivity in Politics
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Research Quarterly
- Vol. 57 (3), 421-429
- https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700307
Abstract
Despite the fact that domestic and foreign corporations, along with trade associations, are some of the most politically active groups in the United States, earlier research has identified a substantial number of firms that are politically inactive. Using fresh data collected from the 2000 election cycle for the Fortune 1000 and the Forbes top foreign investors, we examine business soft money, lobbying expenditures, as well as PAC contributions, in exploring economic, institutional, and political factors that might explain the choice of political activity or inactivity. This article goes beyond earlier research in several ways. Previous research has focused on PAC contributions rather than a fuller range of activities, and it has not included association political activity in the analysis of firm-level behavior. Also, the influence of other actors in the political system, notably environmental and citizen groups, has not been systematically examined. Theoretically, these data allow us to examine the countervailing power thesis, the institutionalists’ arguments about the nature of foreign business behavior, and the unexplored collective action questions that business associational activity poses—are firm and associational activities complements or substitutes?Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Do Some Firms Give? Why Do Some Give a Lot?: High-Tech PACs, 1977-1996The Journal of Politics, 2001
- Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review, 2000
- Foreign‐owned Firms' Campaign Contributions in the United States: An Exploratory StudyPolicy Studies Journal, 1995
- The Determinants of Industry Political Activity, 1978–1986American Political Science Review, 1994
- Corporations, Pacs and the Strategic Link Between Contributions and Lobbying ActivitiesThe Western Political Quarterly, 1991
- The Pluralism of Pluralism: An Anti-Theory?Political Studies, 1990
- Pluralism, Reformed Pluralism and Neopluralism: The Role of Pressure Groups in Policy-MakingPolitical Studies, 1990
- Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of RepresentativesAmerican Political Science Review, 1990
- Money, Business, and the State: Material Interests, Fortune 500 Corporations, and the Size of Political Action CommitteesAmerican Sociological Review, 1989
- Determinants of PAC Participation Among Large CorporationsThe Journal of Politics, 1985