Treatment of acute abscesses by incision, curettage and primary suture without antibiotics: A controlled clinical trial
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 72 (1), 66-67
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800720125
Abstract
One hundred and thirty-seven consecutive acute superficial abscesses were randomly allocated to incision, curettage and primary suture without parenteral antibiotics (64 cases) or to conventional treatment with incision, drainage and dressings (73 cases). Wound healing was faster; 7.0 days: 25.1 days (P<0.01, Wilcoxon's rank sum test), the number of hospital visits was smaller; 3.8 visits: 11.1 visits (P < 0.01) and the time off work was shorter; 4.0 days: 14.1 days (P<0.01) in the group treated by primary closure compared with those managed conventionally. In this study no complications attributable to the withholding of antibiotics occurred. Incision and primary closure of abscesses is safe and more economic than conventional drainage. Routine antibiotic cover is not necessary.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antibiotics in surgical treatment of acute abscesses.BMJ, 1980
- The treatment of acute superficial abscesses: A prospective clinical trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977
- The treatment of acute abscesses by incision, curettage and primary suture under antibiotic coverBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Treatment of axillary abscesses by incision and primary suture under antibiotic coverBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- ANTIBIOTICS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF SEPTIC LESIONSThe Lancet, 1970
- A critique of anal glandular infection in the aetiology and treatment of idiopathic anorectal abscesses and fistulasBritish Journal of Surgery, 1967