Making disjunctions exclusive
Open Access
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 61 (11), 1741-1760
- https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701712960
Abstract
This work examines how people interpret the sentential connective “or”, which can be viewed either inclusively (A or B or both) or exclusively (A or B but not both). Following up on prior work concerning quantifiers (Bott & Noveck, 2004; Noveck, 2001; Noveck & Posada, 2003), which shows that the common pragmatic interpretation of “some”, some but not all, is conveyed as part of an effortful step, we investigate how extra effort applied to disjunctive statements leads to a pragmatic interpretation of “or”, or but not both. Experiment 1 compelled participants to wait for three seconds before answering, hence giving them the opportunity to process the utterance more deeply. Experiments 2 and 3 emphasized “or”, either by visual means (“OR”) or by prosodic means (contrastive stress) as another way to encourage participants to apply more effort. Following a relevance-theoretic line of argument, we hypothesized that conditions encouraging more processing effort would give rise to more pragmatic inferences and hence to more exclusive interpretations of the disjunction. This prediction was confirmed in the three experiments.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constructing a context with intonationJournal of Pragmatics, 2006
- Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferencesCognition, 2006
- Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferencesJournal of Memory and Language, 2004
- Semantic and Pragmatic Competence in Children’s and Adults’ Comprehension of OrPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2004
- Implicature, Relevance and Default Pragmatic InferencePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2004
- Literal meaning, minimal propositions, and pragmatic processingJournal of Pragmatics, 2002
- The Psychophysics ToolboxSpatial Vision, 1997
- Metalinguistic Negation and Pragmatic AmbiguityLanguage, 1985
- Development of comprehension of “or”: Evidence for a sequence of competenciesJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981
- A study of disjunctive reasoningPsychological Research, 1980