Clinical update: obstetric anaesthesia
- 31 August 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Lancet
- Vol. 370 (9588), 640-642
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61320-8
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labourPublished by Wiley ,2007
- Practice Guidelines for Obstetric AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 2007
- “Just Put it in!” Consent for Epidural Analgesia in LabourAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 2006
- Early thoughts on 'Why Mothers Die 2000-2002'Anaesthesia, 2004
- Consent for regional anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: what is material risk?International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2004
- Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean sectionCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004
- Effect of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths on the use of Syntocinon® at Caesarean section in the UK*Anaesthesia, 2003
- Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study Commentary: Obstetric morbidity data and the need to evaluate thromboembolic diseaseBMJ, 2001
- Informed consent for labour epidurals: what labouring women want to knowCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2000
- French Survey of Anesthesia in 1996Anesthesiology, 1999