Are Claims Data Accurate Enough to Identify Patients for Performance Measures or Quality Improvement? The Case of Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Depression
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in American Journal of Medical Quality
- Vol. 21 (4), 238-245
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860606288243
Abstract
The objective of this study was to demonstrate a method to accurately identify patients with specific conditions from claims data for care improvement or performance measurement. In an iterative process of trial case definitions followed by review of repeated random samples of 10 to 20 cases for diabetes, heart disease, or newly treated depression, a final identification algorithm was created from claims files of health plan members. A final sample was used to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV). Each condition had unacceptably low PPVs (0.20, 0.60, and 0.65) when cases were identified on the basis of only 1 International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, code per year. Requiring 2 outpatient codes or 1 inpatient code within 12 months (plus consideration of medication data for diabetes and extra criteria for depression) resulted in PPVs of 0.97, 0.95, and 0.95. This approach is feasible and necessary for those wanting to use administrative data for case identification for performance measurement or quality improvement.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Well Do Automated Performance Measures Assess Guideline Implementation for New-Onset Depression in the Veterans Health Administration?The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 2003
- Identifying Physician‐Recognized Depression from Administrative Data: Consequences for Quality MeasurementHealth Services Research, 2003
- The Unreliability of Individual Physician "Report Cards" for Assessing the Costs and Quality of Care of a Chronic DiseaseJAMA, 1999
- Use of Claims Data for Research on Treatment and Outcomes of Depression CareMedical Care, 1999
- Agreement Between Administrative Files and Written Medical RecordsMedical Care, 1998
- Assessing Quality of Care via HEDIS 3.0: Is There a Better Way?Archives of Family Medicine, 1998
- Using administrative data to describe casemix: A comparison with the medical recordJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- The deliberate misdiagnosis of major depression in primary careArchives of Family Medicine, 1994
- Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databasesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987