Message Framing and Perinatal Decisions
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 122 (1), 109-118
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0620
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of information framing on parental decisions about resuscitation of extremely premature infants. Secondary outcomes focused on elucidating the impact of other variables on treatment choices and determining whether those effects would take precedence over any framing effects.METHODS. This confidential survey study was administered to adult volunteers via the Internet. The surveys depicted a hypothetical vignette of a threatened delivery at gestational age of 23 weeks, with prognostic outcome information framed as either survival with lack of disability (positive frame) or chance of dying and likelihood of disability among survivors (negative frame). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the positively or negatively framed vignette. They were then asked to choose whether they would prefer resuscitation or comfort care. After completing the survey vignette, participants were directed to a questionnaire designed to test the secondary hypothesis and to explore possible factors associated with treatment decisions.RESULTS. A total of 146 subjects received prognostic information framed as survival data and 146 subjects received prognostic information framed as mortality data. Overall, 24% of the sample population chose comfort care and 76% chose resuscitation. A strong trend was detected toward a framing effect on treatment preference; respondents for whom prognosis was framed as survival data were more likely to elect resuscitation. This framing effect was significant in a multivariate analysis controlling for religiousness, parental status, and beliefs regarding the sanctity of life. Of these covariates, only religiousness modified susceptibility to framing; participants who were not highly religious were significantly more likely to be influenced to opt for resuscitation by the positive frame than were participants who were highly religious.CONCLUSIONS. Framing bias may compromise efforts to approach prenatal counseling in a nondirective manner. This is especially true for subsets of participants who are not highly religious.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- The routine and the traumatic in prenatal genetic diagnosis: does clinical information inform patient decision-making?Patient Education and Counseling, 2005
- Delivery room decision-making at the threshold of viabilityThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2004
- The effects of framing and action instructions on whether older adults obtain flu shots.Health Psychology, 2002
- Limits of Viability: Dilemmas, Decisions, and Decision MakersAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2001
- Facilitating informed choice in prenatal testing: How well are we doing?American Journal of Medical Genetics, 2001
- Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter mostPrenatal Diagnosis, 1999
- Management of extremely low birth weight infants: perceptions of viability and parental counseling practicesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Patients' Preferences for Participation in Clinical Decision Making: A Review of Published SurveysBehavioral Medicine, 1998
- Decision-making in the critically ill neonate: cultural background v individual life experiences.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1997
- On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative TherapiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982