Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence
- 29 November 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Biodiversity and Conservation
- Vol. 19 (5), 1205-1223
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9750-z
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 130 references indexed in Scilit:
- Individual movement behavior, matrix heterogeneity, and the dynamics of spatially structured populationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Effects of the structure of pine plantations on their “softness” as barriers for ground-dwelling forest birds in south-central ChileForest Ecology and Management, 2008
- Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scalesJournal of Biogeography, 2007
- Resource complementation and the response of an insect herbivore to habitat area and fragmentationOecologia, 2007
- Landscape context outweighs local habitat quality in its effects on herbivore dispersal and distributionOecologia, 2006
- Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental assessment of boundary permeability for the natterjack toad (Bufo calamita)Oecologia, 2006
- Making the matrix matter: challenges in Australian grazing landscapesBiodiversity and Conservation, 2005
- Host-parasitoid extinction and colonization in a fragmented prairie landscapeOecologia, 2004
- The Matrix Matters: Effective Isolation in Fragmented LandscapesThe American Naturalist, 2001
- The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patchesOecologia, 2001